SESSION 1 – Radiological impact assessment during all phases of nuclear and radiological events

• The effect of terrain modeling on simulated dose rates – Gunther Bijloos — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• Radiological effects and assessment of a “dirty bomb” scenario on a microscale in urban areas – Hartmut Walter — BfS (Germany)

SESSION 2 – Radiological impact assessment during all phases of nuclear and radiological events (Cont.)

• Novel Stochastic and Deterministic Models for Polydisperse Flows Resulting from a Radiological Dispersal Device – Lucian Ivan — CNL (Canada)
• Uncertainty of atmospheric dispersion prediction 9 Source term prediction in case of a severe nuclear accident – Jens Havskov Sørensen — DMI (Denmark)
• Source term prediction in case of a severe nuclear accident – Karine Chevalier-Jabet — IRSN (France)
• Atmospheric transport and dispersion modelling study of the I-131 detected in Jan/Feb 2017 in Europe – Andy Delcloo — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• Improving European decision support reliability and robustness to manage scenarios involving contamination of inhabited areas – Kasper Andersson — DTU (Denmark)
• Seasonality influence in the elaboration of risk maps associated to the transfer of radioactivity through the food chain – Cristina Trueba — CIEMAT (Spain)

SESSION 3 – Radiological impact assessment during all phases of nuclear and radiological events (Cont.)

• Radiological impact assessment in preparedness and response phase for nuclear emergency management in Greece – Dimitris Mitrakos — EEAE (Greece)
• Lessons learnt from the gamma-based monitoring stations of RARE (Radiological Alert network of Extremadura, SW spain): development and real-time performance – Antonio Baeza — LARUEX (Spain)
• Passive dosimetry measurements used in the aftermath of a radiological accident in the framework of “PREPAREDNESS” EMPIR project – Giorgia Iurlaro — ENEA (Italy)
• Voluntary radiation measurement team to enhance the radiation measurement preparedness in Finland – Maarit Muikku — STUK (Finland)

SESSION 4 – Setting-up a transdisciplinary and inclusive framework for preparedness for emergency response and recovery

• European scenario-based stakeholder discussion panels, to test their engagement in the decision making process during the transition phaseof a nuclear emergency – Montero, Milagros — CIEMAT (Spain)
• The local Radiological Emergency Programs in Spain: The Valencia region Program – Ana Bueno — University of Valencia (Spain)
• Delphi study to support the involvement of stakeholders in the decision-making process during the transition phase of a nuclear emergency – Sala Roser — CIEMAT (Spain)
• Stakeholders feedback on mobile Apps and devices for dose and health measurements after nuclear accident (SHAMISEN SINGS project) – Liudmila Liutsko — ISGlobal (Spain)
• Formal and informal participation in emergency Preparedness and Response: a purposeful mapping exercise – Catrinel Turcanu — SCK•CEN (Belgium)

SESSION 5 – Setting-up a transdisciplinary and inclusive framework for preparedness for emergency response and recovery (Cont.)

• Changes in nuclear and radiological threats and hazards from a Norwegian perspective – Øyvind Gjølme Selnæs — DSA (Norway)
• Ensuring Radiation Safety in Slovenian-Croatian Cross-Border Region – Branko Vodenik — Jožef Stefan Institute (Slovenia)
• Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Preparedness in Spain: some keys for improvement – Eduardo Gallego — UPM (Spain)
• Participation in a Conv-Ex-2c Exercise: Preparation, performance and outcomes as an Accident State – Veronica Smith — EPA (Ireland)
• The use of non-radiological resources to support nuclear and radiological emergency response – Robert Ryan — EPA (Ireland)

SESSION 6 – Countermeasures and countermeasure strategies in emergency & recovery, decision support & disaster informatics

• Local stakeholders confronted to mid- and long-term uncertainties in a post-nuclear accident situation: outputs from the TERRITORIES Workshop – Pascal Croüail — CEPN (France)
• Involvement of French stakeholders in the decision-making process in the context of uncertainties – The European project CONFIDENCE – WP4 – Vanessa Durand — IRSN (France)
• Decision support diagrams for public protective actions during nuclear emergencies – Jan Johansson — SSM (Sweden)
• The basis for the Swedish emergency preparedness and response plan for ESS – Anna Maria Blixt Buhr — SSM (Sweden)
• A reflection on the way for setting intervention regions at the end of the urgent phase of a radiological accident – Christophe Murith — FOPH (Switzerland)

SESSION 7 – Countermeasures and countermeasure strategies in emergency & recovery, decision support & disaster informatics (Cont.)

• Simulations of decontamination scenarios using the system dynamics approach – Anna Selivanova — SURO (Czech Republic)
• Significant sources uncertainty in the ERMIN urban dose model – Thomas Charnock — PHE (United Kingdom)
• Agent-based Negotiation Simulation – Shan Bai — KIT (Germany)
• Preparedness for a “dirty bomb” attack: Antidotes and screening capacities as complementary medical countermeasure resources – Prof. Dr. Matthias Port — BIR (Germany)
• Management of contaminated goods in post-accident situation. Lessons learned from Fukushima – Mélanie Maître — CEPN (France)

SESSION 8 – Setting-up a transdisciplinary and inclusive framework for preparedness for emergency response and recovery (Cont.)

• Identification of mental models of uncertainty management in emergency situations – Nadja Zeleznik — EIMV (Slovenia)
• Uncertainties that decision makers, affected population and emergency responders may face during a nuclear emergency – Perko Tanja — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• Non-radiological impact of a nuclear emergency: focus on Psychological and mental health – Zhanat Carr — WHO
• RP Culture in the field of Emergency Preparedness and Response: first outcomes from the European Project ENGAGE – Tatiana Duranova — VUJE (Slovakia)

SESSION 9 – Challenges in estimating the source term and operational radiological picture (on-site versus off-site)

• Update on the IAEA IEC activities in EPR – Frederic Stephani- IAEA
• Identification of atmospheric contamination source in an urban area by approximate Bayesian computation methodology – Piotr Kopka — NCNR (Poland)
• RASTEP – a versatile tool for decision support in nuclear emergency situations – Anders Riber Marklund — Lloyd’s Register Consulting
• Comparison of ensembles of atmospheric dispersion simulations: lessons learnt from the CONFIDENCE project about uncertainty quantification – Irène Korsakissok — IRSN (France)

SESSION 10 – Challenges in estimating the source term and operational radiological picture (on-site versus off-site) (Cont.)

• Source term estimation with a model implemented in the JRODOS DSS – Wolfgang Raskob — KIT (Germany)
• The advanced source inversion module of JRODOS – Spyros Andronopoulos — NCSRD (Greece)
• Real-time use of inverse modeling techniques to assess the atmospheric accidental release of a nuclear power plant – Olivier Saunier — IRSN (France)
• Collaborative Web Application to Support Source Term Assessment – Tuomas Peltonen — STUK (Finland)
• Source term estimation of xenon releases from medical isotope production: a test case for near- range atmospheric dispersion modelling – Johan Camps — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• Analysis of the Fukushima source term: implications for source term estimation from radiological observations during emergencies – Dr. Martin Sogalla — GRS (Germany)

POSTERS

TOPIC A: Radiological impact assessment during all phases of nuclear and radiological events

• Use of different meteorological data for near-range assessments during a nuclear emergency – Johan Camps — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• Large-scale measurements of internal contamination in case of a nuclear accident – Martin Hjellström and Nikola Marković — University of Gothenburg (Sweden)
• Study on optimization for the continuous surveillance network of environmental radioactivity in Portugal – Filipa Jerónimo — IST (Portugal)
• Efficiency of a drone measuring radioactivity for a point source and a homogenous surface contamination – Stef Geelen — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• TRITIUM – a low level real-time monitor systemfor water quality surveillance – José Díaz — University of Valencia (Spain)

TOPIC B: Countermeasures and countermeasure strategies in emergency & recovery, decision support & disaster informatics

• Linking Advanced Monitoring and Modeling in Nuclear Emergency Decision Support Systems – Luke Lebel — CNL (Canada)
• Application of the RODOS system to determination of the restricted use area and emergency planning zones for the planned nuclear power plant in poland – Anna Wawrzynczak or Sławomir Potempski — NCNR (Poland)
• Optimization of the food chain and dose module for terrestrial pathways (FDMT) applied to Portugal – Catarina Inácio — IST (Portugal)

TOPIC C: Setting-up a transdisciplinary and inclusive framework for preparedness for emergency response and recovery

• RAMESIS – support to Citizen Radiation Monitoring Network in the Czech Republic – Petr Kuča — SURO (Czech Republic)
• Modification of the regulatory framework for radiological protection and nuclear safety in Portugal – Marcia Farto — EPA (Portugal)
• How the EU strengthens CBRN response capacities outside the European Union: 2 examples from the Western Balkans and the Black Sea Region – Vandersteen Katrijn — SCK•CEN (Belgium)
• EURDEP system as exercise bed for European nuclear exercises – Miguel Ceballos — JRC-ISPRA